Perspecta 34 explores the temporary relationship between architecture and the larger contexts within which social crisis and cultural transformation take place. The issue examines many questions associated with modernism, including the limits of utopian urban planning, and considers alternatives to space as the dominant organizing concept for architecture. It views the contemporary as a fluid practice in which games, intuition, collective imagination, and style emerge alongside conventional architectural approaches as ways to comprehend and shape the temporary landscape.Case studies—on the Olympics, Belgrade protests, refugee housing—ask how temporary events intensify the possibilities and limitations for architectural innovation. Perspecta 34 also explores the built environment as an ecology of change consisting of dynamic economies, movements of people, and overlapping systems of authority. The issue includes a portfolio of twentieth-century temporary projects that reflect changing ideas of fabrication, the deployment of the architectural object, and architecture’s relationship to social and cultural practices.
Kobo Abe—"The Box Man"
Roy Kozlovsky—"Necessity by Design"
Ed Mitchell—"They’re All Gone"
Arjun Appadurai—"Illusion of Permanence"
Raoul Bunschoten—"Stirring Still: The City Soul and Its Metaspaces"
Krzysztof Wodiczko—"A Dean & DeLuca Coffee Shop Conversation"
Ana Miljački—"Anti-Lobotomy: The Visible Evidence of Resistance in 1990s Belgrade"
Dawn Finley and Mark Wamble—"Notes on System Form: The Rest of the World Exists"
Deborah Gans and Matt Jelacic—"Displacement: The Realpolitik of Utopia"
Sylvia Lavin—"The Temporary Contemporary"
Michael Bell—"Eyes in the Heat: RSE"
Shigeru Ban and Kartikeya Shodhan—"Disaster Relief: Ahmedabad"